Over the last week, about one in ten visitors to mb-blog.com have come direct from Twitter. Apparently my recent post “Are marketers creating a social media bubble?” attracted some attention in the Twitterverse, and this led to an unprecedented surge in visits to the blog. While this level of attention is very welcome, it will just be a temporary blip unless I can continue to provide content that interests these new visitors. And that poses a dilemma. Do I post what you want to hear or what I want to say?
Of course, this is an age-old dilemma for publishers and brands alike. Take the recent commentary on the social media and viral posts. The topics were obviously of interest but some who commented found fault with my reasoning. So be it. Instead of trying to please everyone, I present my own point of view it as clearly as I can. If someone offers a compelling counter-argument then I may revise my opinion and republish.
And I believe that brands should follow the same steps when it comes to social media (see my 2006 post on the topic here). First they need to come up with something that is both valuable to consumers and consistent with what the brand stands for. Then they should try it out, listen to the response and make adjustments if need be. Finally, they need to repeat the process. Many brands fall short at the first step by talking about themselves without offering anything of value to the consumer. And too many brands forget the last step. A conversation is not a one-off line. It is an ongoing process.
Of course, if you want to offer something of value, it helps if you know who you are talking to and what they want. That’s one of the challenging things about writing a blog—it’s hard to be certain who is reading it and what they think. I know how many people read each post, but only about 1 percent provide feedback by posting comments. Does this vocal minority represent all my readers? I don’t know. I can only conjecture about the silent majority by looking at where they come from and how many hits each post receives.
According to the AdReaction 2009 study, the odds are that over 1 in 4 of you will be among the most enthusiastic and engaged group of social media users, those called “fanatics.” That would certainly account for the much stronger response to my posts that focused on Twitter and Facebook. According to the DL segmentation, “social media fanatics” are highly involved with the online world, consider themselves ahead of the times, and are likely to be under the age of 34. And 92 percent of social media fanatics are interested in requests for their opinions and ideas.
Whether or not you fit the profile of a social media fanatic, please consider this a request for your opinions and ideas. Why do you visit this blog? What are you interested in? What would you like to hear more about? Members of the silent majority—I want to hear from you too. Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Email This Post










February 8th, 2010 at 12:25 pm
Why do I visit? Without thinking about that too much, I realize I check the front page of the NYTimes daily so that I am somewhat “in the know” about world events and check your blog for I guess the same reasons, as the NYTimes doesn’t give the same coverage to brands/media. I think I read this to make sure I am up-to-date on the latest thinking relating to the field I’m in now - so please continue providing great new thoughts!
February 8th, 2010 at 1:27 pm
I visit because your topics are relevant and your opinions are reasoned - usually based on research.
February 8th, 2010 at 2:43 pm
Personally I visit because I enjoy the (reasonably) objective perspective of the challenges the advertising and marketing community face in the modern era. There are very few, if any, impartial perspectives but I think your blog offers that and not only on issues digital. The debate with Byron Sharp over the application of Double J was my highlight of 2009. So I would look for more of the same and avoid the temptation for the focus to be shaped by digital zealots, empirical marketing theory debate and advertising best practise for starters is of just as much interest.
February 10th, 2010 at 4:00 am
Thanks for the feedback guys, I really do appreciate it. I will attempt to remain as impartial as possible!!!
If you have any ideas or suggestions for topics you would like to hear about please just mail me or suggest them as a comment.
February 12th, 2010 at 2:26 am
yes i totally agree with your viewpoint. the social media bubble is only growing bigger and should be taken seriously!
February 12th, 2010 at 12:08 pm
Nigel,
Here’s a topic: TV commercials and observed “viewer” behavior. Is there any good (unbiased) video ethnographic research on this subject? Here are some basic questions:
When the TV is on and commercials are running, what portion of the household is actually in the room watching them?
What percent of the time is someone actually paying attention to TV commercials? How often are they actually engaged in TV ads?
How often are “viewers” diverting their attention to a conversation, a ham sandwich, their laptop, a magazine, etc. when TV ads are running?
What is the real CPM for an attentive viewer? An engaged viewer?
I also sent you an email on this topic.
Thanks Nigel!
February 15th, 2010 at 6:59 am
Thanks for the question Tom. As we discussed by mail the two references we came up with were:
http://specials.ft.com/creativebusiness/FT3DDTJE61D.html
and
http://www.thinkbox.tv/server/show/nav.854